Ted and Oprah.

Because of the rain in KY, they sent everyone in the office home early yesterday. When i got home i started making dinner and turned the tv on and there was Ted Haggard on Oprah. This paragraph alone has enough material for a week of posts.

Filed under: Philosophical-Possibly Theological, Postmodernism, Psychology, church , Modernism, Oprah, Postmodernism, Ted Haggard

Another Post-It Note

“Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent.” -Isaac Asimov

Filed under: Attitude, Church History, Interdisciplinary Action, Philosophical-Possibly Theological , 3 laws, asimov, lenny leonard, scapegoat mechanism, violence

Great Expectations

A poor attitude- expecting the worst- will deliver. Just as sure, a great attitude does, in some crazy way, change my expectations. And i will get what i’m expecting. Stuff happens way out of my control- but “there’s a large percentage of things that are under our control” and part of exercising my control is taking charge of my attitude.

Filed under: Attitude, Leadership, Philosophical-Possibly Theological, Psychology , Attitude, expectations

Found in the Lenin Closet.

I want to write a post on Communism and the Church.

Filed under: Philosophical-Possibly Theological, church , Communism, Lenin, Marx

Truth is not a good idea.

Christians and philosophers alike have treated truth as a good idea- as something to be attained. A mental enlightenment. Postmodernism, of course, rejects this idea of truth- of absolute truth, specifically- and for good reason. Truth, as knowledge, is the scholar’s god- but not much good for the rest of us. Postmodernity, by rejecting the compartmentalization of life, helps us see the flaws of this pursuit of truth.

Filed under: Church History, Integral, Philosophical-Possibly Theological, Postmodernism, Theology , aristotle

Compartments.

Life, as rediscovered, is not made of separate, autonomous pieces. Life is an integrated existence of descernable aspects. Thanks to modernity, we have gone on thinking that life is safely compartmentalized; that our life is made up of vaccum-sealed, water-tight compartments we can attend to individually and that we control the flow between them.

Filed under: Integral, Interdisciplinary Action, Philosophical-Possibly Theological, Pomo, Postmodernism, Theology

Certitude, which is a word for saying out loud when one means something specific.

I read something today… to sum up the striking part for me: “We seek out certitude(s) in life and when we hear the gospel we project certitude into it. Really, the gospel is an invitation to fidelity- and certitude is not in the program.”

Huh.

That makes one think.

I mean, i hear that all the time- its not about me, its about Jesus, or others… all so vague and so i just slip back into my search for certitude.

What a great word: certitude.

I just like typing it.

Filed under: Blogging, Philosophical-Possibly Theological, Theology , certitude, fidelity, virtual abbess

The Emergence in Question

So, here’s a theory;

the emergent church is a propaganda product. It does not actually exist. It is a construct of church leadership.  Negativity is always the lowest common denominator. The best way to raise support (money, people, resources) is to create a scenario where there is a good guy and a bad guy and tell people that the bad guy is threatening your way of life, your god, whatever… and it will take money to stop the bad guy. The emergent church is the bad guy.

Is this like the Scapegoat Mechanism we find in ancient religions?

Kind of. The emergent church is too vague. You need names and faces to target or it doesn’t work. The Baghdad thing was fully supported by the american people until they ‘got’ Saddam- and the whole mechanism broke down because they ‘got’ the face. Lost all support for it because you can’t place vague blame- it has to be specific. Terrorist cells? Huh? Bin Laden- yeah, people get that.

Is that where Brian McClaren and Rob Bell come in? 

Exactly. You have to channel your negativity toward names and faces. Clarity is power. Specificity is action. Brian uses emergence theory when talking about church- and it is a beautiful analogy of the church- but i guess that’s why he’s been made the poster boy. I mean, i didn’t need Brian to tell me a bunch of stuff i already knew.

Rob, on the other hand, doesn’t even try to go for the emerence theory stuff directly, uses the term loosely and appropriately, and generally disengages himself from emergent church talk. But his name always comes up when someone needs a scapegoat for their cause of righteousness.

“We need to be careful of terrorist cells and ’squishy theology’”… huh? what? “We’ve got Saddam on the run and Rob Bell is a heretic”. Oh! People get that. 

That’s a terrible theory- why would anyone do that?

There’s a lot of anger out there/in here. People need to place blame. Need to have a place to put their anger. People feel threatened by “new” ideas or thoughts. When people feel like they have to defend the gospel or stand for righteousness or stick up for god, its not because the gospel or righteousness or god is actually threatened, its because their way of life, which they think is divinely-mandated, is threatened, because their power is challenged.

Way of life, anger and power are not abstract concepts- they are very real and present actualities. We deny our involvement by making them abstract and fuzzy and complicated to cancel out our complicity.

We engage in these behaviors without understanding. We claim allegiance to the Scapegoat Crucified when our own complicity created the need. We know not what we do.

Deeply Misguided Theory or Mind-Blowing Revelation?

Filed under: Emergent Church, Eschatology, Interdisciplinary Action, Philosophical-Possibly Theological, Theology, church , brian mcclaren, emergence theory, Emergent Church, Gil Bailie, Rene Girard, Rob Bell, scapegoat mechanism, violence unveiled